Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 vs. inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Direkter Head-to-Head-Vergleich zweier Frontier-Modelle. inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL gewinnt 4 von 8 Disziplinen.
Letzte Synchronisation:
|
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Mehr von Anthropic →
|
inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Inclusionai
Mehr von Inclusionai →
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | 46,8 ★ | 24,6 |
| Speed (Tokens/s) | 47,4 | 147,9 ★ |
| Latency (TTFT) | 3,50 s | 1,30 s ★ |
| Preis Input (USD/1M) | $10.00 | $0.075 ★ |
| Preis Output (USD/1M) | $50.00 | $0.22 ★ |
| Context Window | — | — |
| Modalitäten | text | text |
| Release | 09/2026 | 09/2026 |
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 improves on Claude Fable 5 across the board, with the biggest gains in agentic coding, long-running agentic workflows, and knowledge work: long code refactors, front-end and visual...
inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Ling 3.0 Flash VL builds on Ling 3.0 Flash (124B total / 5.5B active MoE from InclusionAI), further strengthening its language capabilities while adding native visual perception and advanced visual...