Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek: R1
Direkter Head-to-Head-Vergleich zweier Frontier-Modelle. DeepSeek: R1 gewinnt 3 von 8 Disziplinen.
Letzte Synchronisation:
|
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Mehr von Anthropic →
|
DeepSeek: R1
DeepSeek
Mehr von DeepSeek →
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Quality Index | 46,8 ★ | 13,1 |
| Speed (Tokens/s) | 47,4 ★ | 0 |
| Latency (TTFT) | 3,50 s | 0 ms ★ |
| Preis Input (USD/1M) | $10.00 | $1.35 ★ |
| Preis Output (USD/1M) | $50.00 | $3.00 ★ |
| Context Window | — | — |
| Modalitäten | text | text |
| Release | 09/2026 | 05/2025 |
Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 improves on Claude Fable 5 across the board, with the biggest gains in agentic coding, long-running agentic workflows, and knowledge work: long code refactors, front-end and visual...
DeepSeek: R1
DeepSeek R1 is here: Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active in an inference pass....